Effect of Galardin and its Solvents on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a synthetic inhibitor of MMPs (Galardin) and its solvents [ethanol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)] on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of adhesive systems to dentin. Material and Methods: Sound human third molars (n=180) were randomly assigned into 5 based on solution type: DMSO; ethanol; Galardin + DMSO; Galardin + ethanol; and distilled water as control. Then were further subdivided into 6 based on the adhesive system, i.e. 3-step and 2-step etch-and-rinse (ER), one-step and 2-step self-etch (SE) and universal in ER and SE strategies. The samples underwent a 500-round thermocycling procedure at 5±5/55±5°C and were sectioned into 1-mm2 pieces perpendicularly in a cutting machine. The µTBS was measured at a strain rate of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Games-Howell tests (p<0.05). Results: The adhesive system and the solution had significant effects on the µTBS (p<0.001). The universal adhesive in the SE mode resulted in a significant decrease in µTBS compared to the other adhesives (p<0.05). Ethanol, too, resulted in a significant decrease in µTBS compared to other solutions (p<0.05). Conclusion: Galardin and its solvents, except for ethanol, had no detrimental effects on the immediate µTBS.

Effect of Different Fiber Reinforcement Strategies on the Fracture Strength of Composite Resin Restored Endodontically Treated Premolars

Objective: To compare the effect of three different fiber reinforcement strategies on the fracture strength of composite resin restored endodontically treated premolars. Material and Methods: Seventy-two sound human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were divided into 6 groups (n=12) after endodontic treatment. Group 1: intact teeth (positive control); Group 2: endodontically treated teeth without restoration (negative control); Group 3: composite resin restoration; Group 4: placement of fibers at occlusal position; Group 5: splinting the buccal and palatal walls with horizontal fiber posts; Group 6: placement of fibers at the occlusal position after splinting the buccal and palatal walls with horizontal fiber posts. Then fracture strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests at α=0.05. Results: There were significant differences between the negative and positive control groups (p<0.001) and between the negative control group and all the other study groups (p<0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the positive control group and all the experimental groups and between the experimental groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Fiber insertion had no additional reinforcing effect on the fracture strength following composite resin restoration.